Using LLM judges for code review
AI coding
Using LLM judges for code review
- A Second-Pass Agent Reviewer Before the Human Gate
- A Tie-Breaker Prompt That Requires Evidence: Fields and Examples
- From Verdicts to a Queue: A Schema for Judge Scores and Reasons
- Grading Agent Output That Has No Assert: Rubrics and Judges
- Pinning a Rubric to a Judge Call: Versioning and Rerun Protocol
- Retrieval for a Judge: Grounding Scores in Sources
- Setting a Minimum Agreement Rate Before an LLM Judge Gates
- When a Judge Cites a Passage That Does Not Back the Claim
- Writing a Review Rubric an LLM Judge Can Apply
- A Disagreement Log for Two Judges and a Human
- A Disagreement Log for Two Reviewers and a Tie-Breaker
- A Log Schema for Automated Review Verdicts
- A Rubric Change Log: Who Edited Which Criterion and Why
- A Second Judge Pass on Sources: Cost and Score Flips
- An Override Log for Judge and Reviewer Disagreements
- Calibrating an LLM Judge Against Human Labels: A Cookbook
- Costing a Three-Way Gate: Judges, Human Minutes, Throughput
- Fields a Tie-Breaker Must Return: Verdict, Reasons, Evidence
- From Verdicts to a Queue: A Schema for Scores and Reasons
- Holding Prompts Fixed While You Compare Models
- Pinning a Rubric Version to Every Judge Call
- Prompts That Make a Judge Name the Criterion It Applied
- Reading a Package Changelog with a Judge: Fields and Criteria
- Routing Judge Disagreements to a Human Queue
- Sampling the Unanimous Cells for Shared Blind Spots
- Seeding an Eval for a Contradiction Prompt
- Splitting a Rubric into Deterministic Checks and Judge Calls
- Splitting a Rubric into Fact and Style Checks
- Storing a Judge's Reason Next to the Evidence It Quotes
- Storing the Judge's Raw Output Alongside the Hash
- The Cost of a Human Review: Setting a Maximum Override Rate
- Tracking False Passes and False Fails in a Test Gate
- Turning a Context File Edit into a Judge-Scored Diff
- What a Tie-Breaker Must Return When the Evidence Is Two Lines
- When a Judge Field Drifts: Pinning Rubrics and Versions
- When a Model Passes on Average but Fails a Slice
- When a Reviewer Should Abstain Rather Than Score
- When the Judge Model Changes: A Rebaseline Protocol
- When the Tie-Breaker and the Human Reviewer Disagree
- When the Upstream Signal Is a Judge: Automated Review
- Writing Judge Anchors That Survive a Model Upgrade
- Writing the Rubric a Tie-Breaker Reads