The first decision is not technical. It is who owns the next hour. A small team should have three named roles on a printed card: the person who receives the report, the person who can change passwords and revoke sessions, and the person who can talk to the affected employee without turning the conversation into a disciplinary hearing. If your team is three people, those three roles are the same three people, and that is fine. What matters is that the card names them.
Call the person who clicked before you call anyone else. You need four facts and nothing more at this stage: the exact time they clicked, whether they typed anything into the page, whether they downloaded or opened a file, and whether they entered a one-time code or approved a push notification. That last question changes the severity more than any other. Credential phishing is designed to harvest a password and, in many modern campaigns, the second factor as well. The joint CISA, NSA, FBI and MS-ISAC guidance describes exactly this pattern: a fake login portal that captures the username, password and the six-digit code, which the attacker then replays against the real portal in the CISA phishing guidance. If your user typed a code into a page, you are not dealing with a maybe.
Do not ask the employee to "just change your password" on their own. That is the single most common mistake, because it destroys the session tokens and password history you would use to prove whether the account was already accessed from somewhere else. Hold that instruction until step four.
A short script keeps the call calm and short. You are not investigating, you are capturing. Say what you know, say what happens next, and tell the person they did the right thing by reporting it. The UK National Cyber Security Centre makes the point that blaming users for clicking does not work and that a response plan should assume some phishing will always get through in the NCSC phishing guidance. The behavioral research backs this up: a randomized trial across more than 19,500 employees at UC San Diego Health found no significant relationship between recent annual security training and the likelihood of failing a phishing simulation, and only a very small benefit from embedded training per the UC San Diego study announcement and the published paper. Training is not your incident response. The phone call is.



