Psychologists have measured the cost of switching for decades. The American Psychological Association summarizes the research this way: doing more than one task at a time, especially more than one complex task, takes a toll on productivity. In task-switching experiments, people were slower on trials where they switched tasks than on trials where they repeated one, even when the switch was predictable and they had time to prepare.
Two details from that body of work matter for planning a day.
- Complexity raises the cost. In experiments by Rubinstein, Evans and Meyer described by the APA, participants lost time on every switch, and they lost more time as tasks got more complex or less familiar.
- Small costs add up. A single switch may cost only tenths of a second, but the APA notes that repeated switching can add up to large amounts, and that Meyer has said brief mental blocks from shifting between tasks can cost as much as 40 percent of someone's productive time.
Lab switching costs are only part of the story. Real work adds a second problem that lasts much longer than a fraction of a second.
Sophie Leroy's research introduced the idea of attention residue: the persistence of thinking about Task A after you have stopped working on it and started Task B. Across two experiments, she found that it is difficult for people to transition their attention away from an unfinished task, and that their performance on the next task suffers. A Psychology Today piece on the same research describes the everyday version: the first few minutes of a new task feel foggy or distracted, an effect that is easy to confuse with laziness.
For a knowledge worker this means a 30-minute gap between meetings is rarely 30 minutes of deep work. Part of it goes to residue from the last meeting, and part goes to anticipating the next one.



